It is not clear, as Nike wants the court to conclude, that MSCHF is in any way attempting to capitalize on Nike's valuable reputation and customer goodwill by using Nike's marks on the shoes.
Is this the first time a judge has accepted a pair of sneakers as bail?
Legal teams ask a practical question. If large language models are so capable, why does legal AI still depend on curated content, and why does surfacing that content matter so much?
* Sorry Missouri, but your reign as the “Show Me” state is over. Thanks to its immigration law, Alabama is going to be taking over as the “Show Me Your Papers” state. [CNN] * Time to review the footage. Irving Picard stands to lose the game for the Investors if he can’t get an instant […]